<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Optimum Nutrition &#8211; DELICIOUS STRAWBERRY Review (With Pictures!)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.wheyflavor.com/optimum-nutrition-delicious-strawberry-review-taste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.wheyflavor.com/optimum-nutrition-delicious-strawberry-review-taste/</link>
	<description>Your #1 Site For Whey Protein Powder Reviews (and more...)!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2022 14:00:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alex		</title>
		<link>https://www.wheyflavor.com/optimum-nutrition-delicious-strawberry-review-taste/#comment-6755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2018 00:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.wheyflavor.com/?p=1255#comment-6755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hello, Darren.

Hm, I wonder what changed the flavour? Judging by Amazon review scores, many people complain recently (≈ 9 months by my estimation) over distorted flavours and/or changed &quot;recipe&quot;, without specifying exactly what they are meaning. Some even blame lack of Aminogen®. But there is something I don&#039;t get. As I told before, recently I bought two five-pounders with Mocha Cappuccino, both manufactured this year (May, I think), already with &quot;new&quot; recipe, according to reviews and ON representative&#039;s own words. But for me it tastes exactly as the old one - tub from 2016 I am finishing currently. Besides, I doubt it is Aminogen (or lack thereof), as ON is the only Whey that had it, all other I consumed didn&#039;t.

Of course, as usual disclaimer goes, manufacturer has right to change product without forewarning, but the only answer I got from ON reps is that focus groups find no difference between shakes with and without Aminogen, therefore it was removed. As I&#039;ve been told, nothing else changed.

Anyway, good to know, as I am not lover of &quot;fruity-berry&quot; flavours (mostly because very few tastes &quot;about right&quot;), but my &quot;chocolatey-coffey&quot; ones are not as frequent here as many other. 

Keep up the good work and stay safe.

P.S. Hey, new design! Looks good;).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, Darren.</p>
<p>Hm, I wonder what changed the flavour? Judging by Amazon review scores, many people complain recently (≈ 9 months by my estimation) over distorted flavours and/or changed &#8220;recipe&#8221;, without specifying exactly what they are meaning. Some even blame lack of Aminogen®. But there is something I don&#8217;t get. As I told before, recently I bought two five-pounders with Mocha Cappuccino, both manufactured this year (May, I think), already with &#8220;new&#8221; recipe, according to reviews and ON representative&#8217;s own words. But for me it tastes exactly as the old one &#8211; tub from 2016 I am finishing currently. Besides, I doubt it is Aminogen (or lack thereof), as ON is the only Whey that had it, all other I consumed didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Of course, as usual disclaimer goes, manufacturer has right to change product without forewarning, but the only answer I got from ON reps is that focus groups find no difference between shakes with and without Aminogen, therefore it was removed. As I&#8217;ve been told, nothing else changed.</p>
<p>Anyway, good to know, as I am not lover of &#8220;fruity-berry&#8221; flavours (mostly because very few tastes &#8220;about right&#8221;), but my &#8220;chocolatey-coffey&#8221; ones are not as frequent here as many other. </p>
<p>Keep up the good work and stay safe.</p>
<p>P.S. Hey, new design! Looks good;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
